The New Intelligence
By Dr. Marco V. Benavides Sánchez.
No doubt we live in an era where artificial intelligence has ceased
to be a simple tool to become a phenomenon that transforms the very nature of
human thought. What was initially conceived as a means to improve productivity
and access to information, now redefines the way we interact, learn and decide.
In an interconnected world, AI has burst into the devices of
millions of people, offering instant responses and executing tasks with
unprecedented ease. This faceless intelligence without a defined corporate
identity has begun to shape collective thinking, to the point that more and
more individuals trust its answers without questioning them. Its ability to
hold conversations fluidly makes it indistinguishable, in many cases, from an
interaction with another human being.
This phenomenon has changed the way we process information.
Before, the construction of knowledge required effort and judgment; now,
immediacy has displaced critical analysis, generating a growing dependence on
AI. This raises the question of whether humanity is evolving towards a
technology-enhanced intelligence or, on the contrary, is ceding its
intellectual autonomy to algorithms.
The accessibility and low cost of these models have
democratized access to information, allowing anyone to use them without
restrictions. However, this popularity has raised concerns. Research has shown
that, while these systems can offer accurate answers, they often fail in
alarming ways. Data validation and critical thinking have been relegated to the
background, as trust in these intelligences has led to their answers being
assumed as absolute truths.
Even more worrying is the possible influence of programming
in the construction of narratives. Some analyses have detected patterns that
reflect certain biases, suggesting that AI not only answers, but can also
influence the perception of the world. This represents a crucial ethical
dilemma: to what extent is the content generated by AI shaping opinions,
beliefs and behaviors? Is AI replacing traditional moral guidelines and even
the individual's own capacity for discernment?
If any doubt can be resolved with a device in your pants
pocket, is knowledge still necessary? The ease of obtaining answers with a
single click diminishes the motivation to learn, investigate and reflect. Human
curiosity, which has historically driven the advancement of civilization, could
be affected by the fact that dedication to study becomes unnecessary. Are we
becoming dependent on AI to the point of forgetting how to trust our own
capacity for reasoning? Is our effort to understand the world for ourselves
diminishing?
The impact of this evolution is not limited to the individual; it has generated a ripple effect in the technological industry and in society. Software companies and chip manufacturers have had to rethink their strategies in the face of the rise of increasingly advanced models. Competition has accelerated the development of new intelligences, driving innovations that, in turn, reinforce the transformation of human behavior. Millions of people are searching, as if in a new gold rush, for the machine that knows everything and that frees us from the most fundamental job: thinking.
Users face a constant dilemma. Do we ask artificial
intelligences only for facts and data, or have we reached the point of asking
them for opinions on complex dilemmas, delegating our ability to give an
opinion? We cannot ignore that, although these tools are convenient and
efficient, they also have limitations. The lack of precision and the
possibility of bias pose a crossroads: to what extent is it prudent to depend
on an artificial intelligence that may not be entirely objective?
The expansion of AI redefines what it means to think. It is
no longer just about accumulating knowledge, but about how it is accessed and
its veracity is trusted. Does the origin of the information matter? Who
produces it and with what intention? In this new paradigm, human intelligence
merges with technology, creating a symbiosis that can enhance our capabilities
or threaten our cognitive independence. Leaving the discernment between truth
and illusion in the hands of a machine could be the greatest risk of this
intellectual involution.
As we move in this direction, a fundamental question arises:
are we using an artificial intelligence that complements us or are we becoming
a collective intelligence governed by algorithms? The answer will define the
future of our relationship with technology and the role we play in this
automated world. In the end, the real challenge will be to be able to realize
that we have turned off the natural light of thought, in order to follow the
“wise” advice of machines. Only time will tell, I guess.
For more on technological innovation, particularly artificial
intelligence in medicine, come visit me at: